Forgot your password?

Submit Article

At the opening night of Sex and the City 2, I got all dolled up in fancy footwear then joined my friend Lailai and her merry band of gay buddies. As any self-respecting big city’s single girl, Lailai and I are, in a more accurate and PC term, fab hags of flamboyant gays. They’re witty, fashion fluent, provide both comforting shoulders and Haagen-Dasz pints when mean boys make you cry. They’re a keeper.

Whether you’re a devotee of the 6-year TV show as I am, or a newbie circa movie numero uno, you’ll notice that the cherished friendship between girls and gay men was featured full and frontal, no pun intended, when movie numero duo rolled out. The dazzling affair earned thunderous cheers while I, remembered how hilariously kaput the Charlotte-championed introductory of Stanford and Anthony during Carrie’s kaput catwalk stint, wistfully noting that love bloomed late might just last for life.

We all happily jetted off with the fabulous foursome, dropping jaws at the swanky Middle Eastern airline, whose attendants’ hat resembled Jordan Air’s, and at the unapologetic opulence of the Moroccan resort we readily pretended as Abu Dhabi.  But somewhere along the flick I suddenly sat upright and wondered; what exactly am I watching?

Thin storyline, poor character developments, overblown cultural clash, and sadly, even some noticeable fashion faux-pas (which certainly deserves a separate article dedicated to it).

I’m not naïve, okay. Sex and the City, TV show or movies, are not supposed to be some Oscar-worthy drama. But had it been fully fluff I would’ve never followed for years. Even when around Season 3 SJP made executive producer and Carrie made much more focal, rumored to fuel feud with Kim Cattrall plus made the show somehow wasn’t as it’d been when all four were portrayed more equally, I stayed put. The fashion was getting more forward, and the plots remained rich and delightful.

There were Charlotte’s messy divorces and wacky marriages, Miranda’s downtown career and brownstone move, Samantha’s boudoir adventures and sneaking cancer, and Carrie’s roller-coaster romantic rides with or without Mr. Big.

SATC 1 effortlessly picked it all up where it’d left off, with supporting plots smartly entangling each other. Samantha’s LA misadventure, Charlotte’s baby drama, Miranda’s marriage rut, and Carrie’s ultimate altar showdown. The Mexican getaway was seamlessly weaved into the story, as so every other subplot like Steve’s affair leading to Miranda’s misspoke subsequently leading back to Big-Carrie main line. Sure, there was cultural clash in Charlotte’s adamant refusal on local F&B, or fashion faux-pas of the dead, blue bird on Carrie’s bridal headpiece, which I always thought as the secret reason why Big chickened out. I even had a personal grief as Beethoven’s poignant love letter to his mysterious Immortal Beloved, once only savored among Beethoven diehards, made it to general mass. But overall it was an entertaining movie and glorious homage to the show, that not only I dutifully flocked to the cinema twice, to follow the story and watch the wardrobe, I’ve gladly caught the reruns on HBO ever since.

Nothing like that was to be found on the sequel, sadly.

The storyline is thinner than Carrie’s limbs, which isn’t a compliment. Carrie’s marital woe had a good start to revolve further, but fell flat at the weirdly played 2-day-off arrangement, and didn’t rebound even as a ‘meet-cute’ twist ensued. Carrie’s panicky assemblage of ‘to tell or not to tell’ appeared staged and humorless versus SATC 1’s post-altar circle of friends, nailed perfectly by Charlotte’s outburst gesture followed by funny walk in that mermaid gown. Even Carrie’s life as writer, platform of the TV show’s narrative style, was merely an afterthought now.

The plots for the other characters were neither exciting nor character developing. Miranda’s career shift could’ve been less cliché, Charlotte’s eye-popping Irish nanny might’ve been written in more, and Samantha’s mood swings should’ve been presented more classily. Look, if I want to watch shrieking, menopausal women, I’ll hang out with my aunts, okay.

As for her much-criticized Abu Dhabi behaviors, I’d say this: Samantha has ALWAYS been insensitive. Miranda’s mom’s funeral, Charlotte-Trey’s wedding, Steve’s testicular surgery, Lucy Liu’s Birkin snag, need I go on? But the harmless nuisance has crossed to outrageously uncool now.

I didn’t say that because I’m born Muslim—I said so because I’m Sagittarian, the born traveler sign. You travel because you want to learn or at least experience new things, instead of lugging your comfort zone across the globe. When they asked me to cover legs in Balinese temples or shoulders in Italian churches, I respectfully complied. If I were in Israel and they said the elevators wouldn’t operate every Sabbath, I’d walk up the stairs sans fuss. Things get too much? Pack up and go home. Samantha came across as a petulant, myopic Ugly American, a far cry from flexible persona world-class PR execs normally known for.  Plus, as funny as her busted romp with that foxy Danish architect was, couldn’t it been more creative than carbon-copying the infamous British couple in Dubai? Saucy Samantha, you reap what you sow.

Sex might be absent from the scene, yet there were enough eye candy for girls and gays, like the aforementioned foxy architect, Mahmoud the elegant sheik’s aide, and splashing, Speedo-wearing, entire rugby team. For the straight boys who got dragged in; bountiful bellydancers, and a splashing, bouncy nanny.

Will I return to cinema for SATC 2? I haven’t ruled it out.

Should you rule it out? No, exercise your independent right to judge for yourself.

Should SATC reconvene once more? I love the show, I adore the cast, and I sure as hell hail its groundbreaking fashion. Yet I beg, pretty please, don’t ruin further what has considerably been flawless. Sour Sequels have showered us enough with flops that for every successful Lord of the Ring franchise, there were Matrix, Princess Diaries, and Toy Story. I don’t understand why SJP had to hurriedly proclaim SATC 3 in interviews. Earth to Carrie!

If SATC creators could just make peace without a third, perhaps we’d happily make peace with the second’s foibles and eternally ensconce the foursome in our most fabulous, fashion-forward, fun-tastic fibre of past collective memory. And isn’t that what a legacy is essentially all about?

Not much sex, nor story. Yet there’s fashion in a, though not the, city.

Overall, two stars out of four.

More about the fashion faux pas and (few) glorious one in the next article.


9 Comments to “Sour Sequel Presents ‘Fashion is the Story in the City’”

  1. mybagstage says:

    Wow… tough one :) I haven’t watched it yet, only have watched the first SATC but yep… there’s always a huge burden for any sequels director to keep the momentum and make the movie as good as the first one, if not better :)

  2. meiri says:

    i’ve watch twice and still didn’t know the fun part.
    boring!

  3. jacobian says:

    the film lacks conflict though.not really that enjoyable.

  4. mia says:

    Great review Lynda!

    My flatmate went for the second time tonight-despite the almost non-existent plot, the lure of eye candy and fashion proved to be too much. He ultimately succumbed.

  5. puti says:

    gw suka sepatu sepatu mereka….

  6. i have all the DVD series *love them all :*
    love the movie :D is superrr ^^ watching it over and over again :p

  7. hemlis says:

    agreeing with you on the weak storyline and samantha’s annoying insensitivities.
    but wouldn’t mind to watch it the second time, in fact already planning to hunt for its dvd version, just for the fashion and the interior designs. what sweet sweet eye candies they are!
    well, to avoid getting annoyed with the movie, am considering muting the sound while watching, pausing, rewinding, watching it again. heheheh.

  8. intan says:

    wow.. you’re being so cynical about this movie.

    Samantha is a mess, she’s funny yet hilarious & crazy at the same time. I think it’s normal woman her age fighting over menopause. She always pay too much attention when it comes to her sex life, remember when Miranda’s mother died, all she can think is her inability to orgasm?
    Charlotte just being herself, a mother & wife. She faced a common problem in household, which is my married girlfriends have it too. so they feel that they have companion.
    Miranda, more fun than she ever before. Maybe she wanted to release the pressure from her workplace.
    Carrie, well… this time Carrie is a jerk. Couldn’t she think about her affair with Big in the season 3? And she almost repeated it in the movie. but i love seeing her face when she found out about the 20$ shoes. LOL

    as a huge fan of satc (the series), i really missed the bond between the gals. i missed the witty, funny conversation between them, in the cafetaria without make up on or even branded items. just the gals with their different characters & different point of view. It’s a lot interesting than to see the ever changing fashion in the movie.

    i feel pity for michael patrick king, he’s such a great storyteller (even Sarah praised him so much). apparently, there are many fashion companies who queue to be IN the movie. and he couldn’t help to pick all of them.
    IMO, sex and the city 2 is totally a guilty pleasure. i already watched it twice and wouldn’t mind to watch it again. my favorite part is when the gal singing “i am woman” song & anthony-stanford wedding is too good to be true..

    but you know what, the soundtrack is just awesome!! go n grab it! http://bit.ly/92u4ME

  9. Affi says:

    I agree with most of Lynda’s review, although about half of the movie I decided to just stop analyzing it too much and just watched it for the sake of ‘meeting’ the 4 girls again and it was actually still pretty enjoyable. I had a few good laughs. (the campy Liza Minelli doing ‘All the Single Ladies’? Hilarious!) However, admittedly, I also cringed in some moments, like when Carrie trying to pull of her usual ‘flirtatious/innocent’ shtick on Big. I mean, it just doesn’t work anymore, she is 45 years old for crying out loud! I also think the writers sort of ‘forgot’ to develop Carrie’s character. For someone who’s been married for 2 years, and at her age, the problem she had with Big (if you could even call it a problem) is way too shallow. But then again, Carrie was never my favorite character in SATC so I might be bias :D

Leave a comment...

Login or Register to post a comment.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Editor's Corner

1. The Sporty Fragrance Note: A floral citrus fragrance combining grapefruit and blue lotus, resulting in a vibrant and energetic fragrance. Nopai's Review: I never really considered ...
There are three types of Levi's CurveID jeans available: Slight Curve, Demi Curve and Bold Curve. To know more about the different type of CurveID and ...
We've also faced with terribly sad news, our Editor Rizka leaving the company to pursue career in different area. We held one exciting farewell party ...
Did you know that Fashionese Daily this year is already five years old? Such a milestone, right? It has been nothing but exciting and colourful five ...
I know, after this particular post, anyone would laugh when I throw them the idea of me going on a living with less journey. To ...

Online Shop

Partners